🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach only to fire them for using too much that system. Hire the project manager and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.