As a Committed Free-Market Advocate, Yet Medicare for All Is the Optimal Solution for US Health System

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of federal military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances is that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.

Mathew Valdez
Mathew Valdez

A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in online casino reviews and player strategy development.