🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios introduced a new game mode called Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the standard Breakthrough format but features several key adjustments:

• Every squad includes only 8 human participants, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Actions performed by real players award complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Only two locations can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, the playlist lives up to its title: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, since it provides more options for players seeking different methods to have fun with the title. But, if video games have taught us anything, it's that you can't please everyone. In other words, many Battlefield 6 players are mad.

Community Reactions: Anger to Praise

"People want human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," states one reply to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing idea," says a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," while someone else details everything they consider to be problematic in the game: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads one Reddit comment. "The community fails to see that there are players who actually go outside and don't play this game all the time. Let them find a middle ground," states a different comment. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," and someone else applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Community Input

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. A few folks have pointed out that it could increase wait times even longer for different playlists because of the large amount of playlists currently available. Similarly, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a required amount of real players, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was promised to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base compromising in the middle, as per forum feedback. Another labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced so much fun in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

If the development team has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Tasks that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics shows this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.