🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots added after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.